Distracted Driving Accidents in Texas: What Victims Need to Know

Have you been injured in an accident by a distracted driver in the DFW area? You’re not alone. Every day, innocent victims face life-changing injuries because someone couldn’t wait to check their phone. If you’ve been hurt in a distracted driving accident, you have rights. The Law Office of Joel M. Vecchio, P.C. can help you protect them.

Distracted Driving is More Than Just Texting

When most people think of distracted driving, they picture someone texting behind the wheel. But under Texas law, distraction includes any activity that takes your attention away from driving—whether manual (hands off the wheel), visual (eyes off the road), or cognitive (mind off driving). For example:

• Texting or typing on a phone
• Eating or drinking while driving
• Reaching for items in the vehicle
• Adjusting radio or climate controls
• Applying makeup or grooming
• Looking at GPS or navigation systems
• Reading messages or emails
• Watching videos
• Rubbernecking at accidents or roadside events

Alarming Statistics

Texas has a growing crisis:

• Distracted driving contributes to approximately 29% of all roadway crashes nationwide
• Texas had 403 deaths and over 20,700 serious injuries from distracted driving in 2023
• Taking your eyes off the road for just 2 seconds doubles your crash risk—at 60 mph, that’s 176 feet traveled essentially blind

Texas Laws on Distracted Driving

Texas has specific laws addressing distracted driving that can strengthen your personal injury claim:

Electronic Messaging While Driving Law (Sec. 545.4251, Texas Transportation Code)

Effective September 1, 2017, Texas enacted a statewide ban on texting while driving. This law prohibits motorists from reading, writing, or sending electronic messages (such as texts, emails etc) while operating a moving vehicle. According to TxDOT Executive Director James Bass, “One in five crashes in Texas is caused by distracted driving.”

Sec. 545.4251. USE OF PORTABLE WIRELESS COMMUNICATION DEVICE FOR ELECTRONIC MESSAGING; OFFENSE.

An operator commits an offense if the operator uses a portable wireless communication device to read, write, or send an electronic message while operating a motor vehicle unless the vehicle is stopped.

Violations of this law start at $25-$99 for first offenses, with subsequent offenses carrying fines up to $200.

School Zone Restrictions

Texas imposes a total ban on handheld device use in school zones (unless the vehicle is fully stopped). If your accident occurred in one of these areas, the driver could face higher liability.

Texas Transportation Code § 545.4252. “Use of Portable Wireless Communication Device in School Crossing Zone”

(a) Prohibits operators from using a handheld device while driving in a school crossing zone.

*(b) Exceptions: Emergency calls, hands-free mode, or when vehicle is stopped.*

Talking on Cell Phones While Driving

Unlike texting, Texas state law generally allows adult drivers to make and receive handheld phone calls while driving, except in these situations:

• Drivers with learner’s permits cannot use cell phones during their first six months of driving
• Drivers under 18 are prohibited from using handheld devices while driving
• All drivers are prohibited from using handheld devices in school zones when reduced speed limits are in effect
• School bus operators are prohibited from using cell phones while driving if children are present

Stricter Local Ordinances

Some cities in Texas have passed stricter local “hands‑free” ordinances that prohibit drivers from holding or using a phone for any purpose while a vehicle is in motion. These ordinances can impose fines up to $500 for violations.

Dallas, Denton (September 2017), Little Elm (May 2001, Ordinance 1308), Celina (May 2018 12.07, § 12.07), San Antonio, Austin, Amarillo, Galveston, El Paso, Corpus Christi, Mexia, Missouri City, the Canyon, San Angelo, Snyder, Hurst, Lakeway, Stephenville and Wichita Falls are among the more than 60 Texas cities that have enacted local distracted driving laws.

It’s considered a violation to even hold your wireless device in your hand while operating a motor vehicle. You are considered operating a motor vehicle if your vehicle is moving or stopped on a public road or right-of-way, unless it is lawfully parked. Lawfully parked does not mean stopped at a stop sign or traffic lights, stopped in traffic, or traffic congestion.

How Fault Works in Texas Accident Cases

Texas follows a “modified comparative fault” system with a 51% bar rule (read more about the 51% bar rule here). This means:

• You can recover damages as long as you were 50% or less responsible for the accident
• Your compensation will be reduced by your percentage of fault
• If you’re found to be more than 50% at fault, you cannot recover anything

This is why having an experienced attorney is crucial—the other side will often try to shift blame to you to reduce or eliminate your compensation.

What Damages Can You Recover?

If you’ve been injured by a distracted driver, you may be entitled to various forms of compensation:

Economic Damages

• Medical expenses (past and future)
• Lost wages and earning capacity
• Property damage
• Rehabilitation costs

Non-Economic Damages

• Pain and suffering
• Emotional distress
• Loss of enjoyment of life
• Physical impairment

Exemplary Damages

In cases of gross negligence -such as a driver watching videos while driving – you may be eligible for additional punitive damages designed to punish particularly reckless behavior.

Crucial Evidence in Distracted Driving Cases

Cell Phone Records

One of the most powerful pieces of evidence in these cases is the at-fault driver’s cell phone records. These can prove the driver was actively using their device at the time of the crash.

Social Media Activity

Posts showing phone use before the crash can be admissible evidence of distraction. Even location data from apps like Google Maps can demonstrate that a driver was actively using their phone.

Eyewitness Testimony

Other drivers or pedestrians who observed the at-fault driver using their phone before the collision can provide powerful testimony.

Why Time Is Not On Your Side

Evidence in distracted driving cases can disappear quickly:

• Cell phone records may only be retained by carriers for a limited time
• Social media posts can be deleted
• Surveillance footage from nearby businesses may be overwritten

This is why it’s crucial to contact an attorney immediately after your accident. At The Law Office of Joel M. Vecchio, P.C., we can send preservation letters and file motions to ensure critical evidence is preserved.

How The Law Office of Joel M. Vecchio, P.C. Can Help

Our firm specializes in holding distracted drivers accountable. When you work with us, we will:

• Immediately subpoena phone records before they can be deleted
• Investigate all possible liable parties, including employers if the driver was on the job
• Work with accident reconstruction and human factors experts to demonstrate exactly how distraction caused your injuries
• Build a compelling case using Texas’s distracted driving laws
• Fight for maximum compensation for all your losses

Don’t Face This Alone – Contact Us Today

If you or a loved one has been injured by a distracted driver in Texas, don’t wait to get the help you deserve. The Law Office of Joel M. Vecchio, P.C. offers free, no-obligation consultations to discuss your case.

Call us today or fill out our online form to schedule your free case review. Remember, we work on a contingency fee basis, which means you pay nothing unless we win your case.

Legal References

• Texas Transportation Code (Sec. 545.4251, 545.4252)
• Texas Civil Practice & Remedies Code (Ch. 33, 41)
• NHTSA 2023 Distracted Driving Report

from Joel Vecchio Law https://www.vecchioinjurylaw.com/distracted-driving-accidents-in-texas-what-victims-need-to-know/
via The Law Office of Joel M. Vecchio

Your Legal Rights After Fatal Motorcycle Accidents

Your Legal Rights After a Fatal Motorcycle Accident

Educational Guide by The Law Office of Joel M. Vecchio, P.C.

On the morning of June 7, 2025, a young woman’s life was cut tragically short on the 2400 block of North Central Expressway near Park Blvd (near the Plano-Richardson border, and minutes from our Plano office.) The 27-year-old motorcyclist was killed in a collision with former NFL corner back Kelvin Joseph Jr., who left the scene and didn’t contact police for nearly an hour. He was arrested by Richardson police and charged with both Driving While Intoxicated (a misdemeanor) and Collision Involving Personal Injury or Death (a felony).

This heartbreaking loss reminds us that behind every accident statistic is a real person with family, friends, and dreams that will never be fulfilled. While we can’t bring back what was lost, we can help families understand their rights and seek the justice their loved one deserves.

Criminal Charges vs. Civil Claims

The Two-Track Legal System

Many families don’t realize that criminal charges and civil claims operate on separate tracks. In this case, the driver faces:

Criminal Charges (State of Texas vs. Kelvin Joseph Jr.):

• Driving While Intoxicated (Class B Misdemeanor)
• Collision Involving Personal Injury or Death (Second-Degree Felony)
• Leaving the scene of a collision
• Failing to stop and render aid

Civil Rights (Family vs. Joseph Jr.):

• Wrongful death claim
• Survival action claim
• Insurance coverage issues

Why Criminal Charges Don’t Help Families Financially

Criminal penalties – even felony convictions – don’t provide financial compensation to grieving families. Fines paid go to the state, and jail time doesn’t replace lost income or pay for funeral expenses. This is why pursuing civil remedies with a local personal injury lawyer is essential for families seeking both justice and financial recovery.

Texas Wrongful Death Law

Who Can File a Wrongful Death Claim

Under Texas Civil Practice & Remedies Code Chapter 71, the following parties can file a wrongful death lawsuit:

• Surviving spouse
• Children of the deceased
• Parents of the deceased

Types of Damages Available

Economic Damages:

• Lost wages and benefits the deceased would have earned
• Loss of inheritance that would have been left to family
• Reasonable funeral and burial expenses
• Medical expenses related to the final injury

Non-Economic Damages:

• Mental anguish suffered by surviving family members
• Loss of companionship, society, and comfort
• Loss of guidance, advice, and counsel
• Grief and sorrow

Special Challenges in Motorcycle Accident Cases

Overcoming Bias

Unfortunately, motorcyclists often face unfair bias in legal proceedings. Some people incorrectly assume motorcyclists are reckless or somehow “asking for trouble.” Our role is to present the facts objectively and ensure the victim’s memory is treated with dignity and respect.

Severity of Injuries

Motorcycle accidents typically result in more severe injuries or fatalities due to the lack of protection compared to enclosed vehicles. This reality often means higher damages but also more complex medical evidence and expert testimony requirements.

Unique Investigation Needs

Motorcycle accidents require specialized accident reconstruction expertise. Factors like:

• Visibility issues
• Road conditions
• Weather factors
• Vehicle dynamics
• Protective gear usage

All require expert analysis to build a complete picture of what occurred.

High-Profile Cases: Additional Considerations

When cases involve public figures like professional athletes, additional factors come into play:

Media Attention:

• Extensive news coverage can affect potential jury pools
• Social media discussions may influence public opinion
• Privacy concerns for all parties involved

Financial Resources:

• Professional athletes often carry higher insurance policy limits
• Additional assets may be available for compensation
• Enhanced ability to hire expert legal representation

Public Scrutiny:

• Increased pressure on all parties to resolve cases appropriately
• Greater accountability for professional conduct
• Potential impact on endorsements and career prospects

The Joseph case demonstrates how celebrity status can both complicate and potentially benefit wrongful death claims, depending on how the case is handled.

Hit-and-Run Complications – When Drivers Flee the Scene

Legal Obligations After an Accident

Texas Transportation Code 550.021 requires drivers involved in accidents resulting in injury or death to:

• Stop immediately at the scene
• Remain at the scene until police arrive
• Provide reasonable assistance to injured persons
• Provide identification and insurance information

Failure to meet these obligations – especially when death results – elevates charges to felony level.

When Drivers Flee the Scene

When drivers flee the scene, several complications arise:

• Evidence may be compromised or lost
• Insurance companies may deny coverage
• Investigation becomes more complex
• Additional punitive damages may be available

In the Joseph case, the nearly one-hour delay before contacting police significantly complicated both the criminal charges and potential civil liability. The fact that Joseph was a professional athlete with substantial resources may also impact both insurance coverage availability and potential damage calculations.

Insurance Challenges in Fatal Accident Cases

Multiple Coverage Sources

Several insurance policies may provide coverage:

• At-fault driver’s liability insurance
• Victim’s uninsured/underinsured motorist coverage
• Umbrella or excess policies
• Employer-provided life insurance or benefits

Hit-and-Run Insurance Issues

When drivers initially flee the scene:

• Insurance companies may investigate more aggressively
• Coverage denials become more likely
• Uninsured motorist coverage may become primary
• Additional legal challenges arise in securing compensation

Steps Families Should Take Immediately

Protecting Your Legal Rights

1. Contact an experienced wrongful death attorney immediately – Don’t wait for criminal proceedings to conclude
2. Preserve all evidence – Photos, medical records, employment documents, phone records
3. Avoid speaking with insurance companies without legal representation
4. Document the victim’s life – Work history, relationships, future plans, financial contributions
5. Keep detailed records – All expenses, communications, and impacts from the loss

Working Alongside Criminal Prosecutors

Civil attorneys can coordinate with prosecutors to:

• Access police reports and evidence
• Obtain witness statements
• Use criminal discovery in civil proceedings
• Ensure victim’s family interests are represented

However, prosecutors represent the state’s interests, not the family’s financial interests. Separate legal representation is essential.

Why Local Representation Matters

Understanding the Area

The Law Office of Joel M. Vecchio, P.C. is located in Plano, just minutes from where this tragic accident occurred near the Park Boulevard area. Our familiarity with:

• Local roadway conditions and traffic patterns
• Richardson Police Department procedures (who handled the arrest)
• Collin and Dallas County court systems
• Area hospitals and medical facilities
• Local expert witnesses and accident reconstructionists

This local knowledge proves invaluable in building strong cases for our clients.

Community Connection

We’re not just legal advocates – we’re neighbors. We understand the impact these tragedies have on our community and are committed to helping families navigate both their grief and the complex legal challenges they face.

Building a Strong Wrongful Death Case

Independent Investigation

While police conduct criminal investigations, civil attorneys must conduct parallel investigations focused on:

• Liability determination
• Damage calculation
• Insurance coverage identification
• Expert witness preparation
• Evidence preservation

Expert Witnesses Needed

Successful wrongful death cases typically require testimony from:

• Accident reconstruction specialists
• Economic experts (to calculate lost earnings)
• Medical experts
• Life care planners
• Vocational rehabilitation specialists

Calculating Future Losses

Determining the economic value of a life cut short requires complex calculations considering:

• Age and life expectancy
• Education and career trajectory
• Historical earnings and benefits
• Inflation and economic factors
• Personal vs. family expenses

Settlement vs. Trial Considerations

Factors Affecting Case Value

• Strength of liability evidence
• Available insurance coverage
• Victim’s age and earning capacity
• Number and relationship of survivors
• Degree of fault or negligence involved

When Cases Go to Trial

While many wrongful death cases settle, trials may be necessary when:

• Insurance coverage is insufficient
• Liability is disputed
• Parties cannot agree on damage amounts
• Punitive damages are warranted

Your Rights Matter

The tragic loss of life of a young motorcycle rider on North Central Expressway involving former NFL player Kelvin Joseph Jr. reminds us that impaired driving devastates families regardless of who is behind the wheel. While Joseph’s celebrity status has brought additional media attention to this case, the fundamental legal principles remain the same for all wrongful death situations.

If your family has suffered a similar loss, know that you have legal rights and options. The civil justice system exists to provide accountability and compensation when negligence takes a loved one’s life.

Contact The Law Office of Joel M. Vecchio, P.C.

If you have questions about wrongful death law or need guidance after losing a loved one in an accident, we’re here to help. Our Plano office provides free, confidential consultations to discuss your situation and explain your legal options.

We handle wrongful death cases on a contingency fee basis – you pay no attorney fees unless we recover compensation for your family.

This article is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Every case involves unique facts and circumstances. Contact our office to discuss your specific situation and learn about your legal rights.

from Joel Vecchio Law https://www.vecchioinjurylaw.com/your-legal-rights-after-fatal-motorcycle-accidents/
via The Law Office of Joel M. Vecchio

Don’t Make This Legal Mistake and Lose Your Car Crash Case

Wolf v. Moughon: A Case Study in Negligence Per Se

Imagine getting into a car accident that wasn’t your fault. Now imagine losing your case in court. Sounds unfair, right? That’s exactly what happened to Mary and Shannon Wolf in Houston. But here’s the twist: they should have won their case easily.

So, what went wrong? And more importantly, how can you avoid the same mistake if you ever end up in court? Joel M. Vecchio – a car accident lawyer in Plano – explains what happened.

When we look into this Texas car crash case deeper, we find:

• The one legal strategy that could have changed everything.
• Why the jury made a surprising decision.
• How a simple driving mistake can cost you big time.

Read on to discover how a small detail in the law can make or break your case. You’ll learn why choosing the right lawyer isn’t just important – it’s everything.

Case Background

• In November 1974, Carol Moughon’s vehicle crossed the center line of a Houston city street, hitting the Wolfs’ vehicle.
• This resulted in significant damage to the Wolfs’ vehicle and personal injuries to Mary and Shannon Wolf.
• Carol Moughon had taken her car to a repair shop two days earlier for brake problems.
• Carol Moughon couldn’t explain why her car crossed into the wrong lane.

The subsequent legal proceedings highlight the critical distinction between common law negligence and negligence per se in Texas traffic law.

Legal Context

Negligence Per Se in Texas

Negligence per se is a legal doctrine where the violation of a statute designed to protect public safety automatically constitutes negligence. In Texas, this doctrine has been consistently applied in traffic law cases.

Relevant Statute

In 1974, the Vernon’s Annotated Civil Statutes of Texas, Article 6701d, Section 52 stated:

Upon all roadways of sufficient width a vehicle shall be driven upon the right half of the roadway.

This statute was designed to prevent head-on collisions and protect public safety on roadways. This statute was repealed in 1995, and the Texas Transportation Code Section 545.051 now governs the rules for driving on the right side of the roadway.

Sec. 545.051.  DRIVING ON RIGHT SIDE OF ROADWAY.  (a)  An operator on a roadway of sufficient width shall drive on the right half of the roadway…

Case Progression

Initial Trial

The case was initially presented as a common law negligence claim. The jury was asked:

1. “Do you find that the failure of Carol Moughon to keep her vehicle entirely within the right half of the roadway was negligence?”
2. “Did Carol Moughon fail to make such an application of the brakes as a person using ordinary care would have made?”

The jury answered “No” to both questions, resulting in a take-nothing judgment against the Wolfs.

A “take-nothing judgment” is when the person suing (in this case, the Wolfs) doesn’t get anything they asked for in the lawsuit. It’s like going to a store and leaving with empty hands – you “take nothing” with you. For the Wolfs, this meant they didn’t get any money to pay for their car damage or injuries. They basically lost the case.

Analysis of Jury Decision

The jury’s “No” answers to both questions can be attributed to several factors:

1. Framing of Questions: The questions were framed in terms of “negligence” and “ordinary care,” concepts that can be subjective and open to interpretation. This allowed the jury to consider Moughon’s intentions and efforts rather than focusing solely on her actions.
2. Sympathy Factor: Moughon’s testimony about recent brake repairs may have garnered sympathy from the jury. They might have viewed her as a responsible driver who was trying to address vehicle issues, rather than as someone negligent.
3. Lack of Clear Causation: The questions didn’t establish a clear link between Moughon’s actions and the accident. This allowed the jury to speculate about other possible causes.
4. High Bar for Negligence: In common law negligence, the plaintiff must prove that the defendant failed to exercise reasonable care. The jury may have felt that Moughon’s actions, while resulting in an accident, didn’t rise to the level of failing to exercise reasonable care.
5. Confusion About Legal Standards: Without clear instruction on the relevant traffic law, the jury may have been unsure about what exactly constitutes negligence in this situation.
6. Focus on Brake Application: The second question specifically about brake application might have misled the jury into thinking that proper brake use was the primary issue, rather than the fact of crossing the center line.

This outcome underscores the importance of properly framing the case and jury questions to focus on the most relevant legal issues.

Appeal

On appeal, the court recognized that the case should have been tried under the theory of negligence per se. The court suggested that more appropriate questions would have been:

1. “Did Carol Moughon’s vehicle cross the center line of the road?”
2. “If yes, was there any unavoidable reason for the vehicle to cross the center line?”
3. “Did the position of Carol Moughon’s vehicle on the left side of the road directly lead to the collision with the Wolfs’ vehicle?”

Legal Analysis

Negligence Per Se Application

The appeals court correctly recognized that Moughon’s violation of Vernon’s Annotated Civil Statutes of Texas, Article 6701d, Section 52 constituted negligence per se. This shifted the burden to Moughon to provide a legally acceptable excuse for the violation.

Article 6701d was repealed in 1995, and the Texas Transportation Code Section 545.051 now governs the rules for driving on the right side of the roadway. It requires drivers to stay on the right unless they are passing, avoiding an obstacle, or other specific situations that permit driving on the left.

Excuse and Proximate Cause

Moughon claimed her car had brake problems, but failed to provide evidence that these problems caused her to cross the center line. In negligence per se cases, the defendant must provide some evidence of a legally acceptable excuse, such as an emergency, incapacity, or impossibility of compliance.

Proximate Cause

The court found that Moughon’s unexcused violation of the statute also established proximate cause as a matter of law. The statute itself provides guidance on foreseeability, as it’s designed to prevent the exact type of accident that occurred.

How We Could Have Better Defended the Wolfs

1. Proper Legal Theory: We would have presented the case under the theory of negligence per se from the outset, focusing on the statutory violation rather than common law negligence.
2. Crossing the center line can be presented as “failure to drive on the right side of the roadway“, which violates specific statutes in the Texas Transportation Code. This could also be cited as “driving on the wrong side of the road” or “crossing into oncoming traffic.”
3. Effective Jury Questions: We would have proposed jury questions that directly addressed the elements of negligence per se, similar to those suggested by the appeals court.
4. Burden of Proof: We would have emphasized that once the statutory violation was established, the burden shifted to Moughon to provide a legally acceptable excuse.
5. Expert Testimony: We could have brought in an expert to testify about the mechanics of the accident, potentially disproving Moughon’s claim about brake issues.
6. Precedent Citation: We would have cited relevant Texas Supreme Court cases establishing the application of negligence per se in similar traffic law violations.

Conclusion

The Wolf v. Moughon case underscores the importance of properly framing a case under the correct legal theory. By applying the doctrine of negligence per se and focusing on the statutory violation, we could have secured a more favorable outcome for the Wolfs at the initial trial stage, avoiding the need for a costly and time-consuming appeal process.

At The Law Office Of Joel M. Vecchio, P.C., we have a strong understanding of Texas traffic law and the nuances of negligence per se. This positions us to effectively represent clients in similar cases, ensuring that their rights are fully protected under the law.

from Joel Vecchio Law https://www.vecchioinjurylaw.com/wolf-v-moughon-negligence-per-se/
via The Law Office of Joel M. Vecchio

Why You Need a Personal Injury Lawyer to Fight for You?

 

 

Looking for a personal injury lawyer who truly cares? Vecchio Injury Law helps you fight for justice and fair compensation. Learn why we’re the team you need today!

Introduction

Accidents happen, don’t they? One minute you’re cruising through life, and the next… BAM! You’re stuck dealing with injuries, medical bills, and insurance headaches. That’s where a personal injury lawyer swoops in like a superhero. 

At Vecchio Injury Law, we’ve got your back when the going gets tough. Let’s break it down and see why hiring a personal injury lawyer could be the smartest move you’ll ever make.

What Does a Personal Injury Lawyer Do?

Imagine you’ve been hurt in a car accident, slipped on a wet floor, or even bitten by a dog. A personal injury lawyer is the expert who steps in to make sure you get the compensation you deserve. Here’s what they’ll handle for you:

• Investigate your case: They’ll dig deep to find out what happened and who’s responsible.
• Deal with insurance companies: No need to argue with adjusters, your lawyer’s got it covered.
• Calculate damages: They’ll figure out how much you’re owed for medical bills, lost wages, and pain and suffering.
• Fight for you in court: If it comes to that, they’ll represent you and work to win your case.

Why You Shouldn’t Go It Alone?

You might think, “Hey, I can handle this myself!” But hold up, it’s not that simple. Insurance companies are pros at paying you less than you deserve. Without a lawyer, you might leave money on the table. 

Plus, the legal system can be confusing, kind of like trying to read a map upside down. With Vecchio Injury Law by your side, you’ll have a guide who knows every twist and turn.

Types of Personal Injury Cases We Handle

At Vecchio Injury Law, we’re like a Swiss Army knife, ready for anything. Here are some of the cases we tackle:

• Car accidents: From fender benders to serious crashes.
• Slip and falls: Property owners need to keep their spaces safe.
• Workplace injuries: Because your job shouldn’t cost you your health.
• Medical malpractice: When doctors or nurses make mistakes, we’re here to help.
• Dog bites: Even man’s best friend can get a little bitey.

How to Choose the Right Lawyer?

Finding the right personal injury lawyer is a bit like picking the perfect pair of shoes—it’s all about fit. Here’s what to look for:

• Experience: How long have they been in the game?
• Success stories: What’s their track record like?
• Communication: Do they explain things in a way that makes sense?
• Empathy: Do they really care about your situation?

At Vecchio Injury Law, we check all those boxes and more.

Frequently Asked Questions

How much does it cost to hire a personal injury lawyer?

Most work on a contingency basis, which means you don’t pay unless you win your case.
 

How long will my case take?

It depends, but we’ll work to resolve it as quickly as possible while ensuring you get fair compensation.
 

What if I was partly at fault?

No worries! In many cases, you can still get compensation, though the amount might be reduced.

Conclusion

Life can throw you curveballs, but you don’t have to face them alone. A personal injury lawyer from Vecchio Injury Law can help you get back on your feet, both literally and financially. We’re here to handle the tough stuff so you can focus on healing.

Ready to take the first step? Call us today at (972) 380-4444 or visit our website at https://www.vecchioinjurylaw.com. Don’t wait, your future self will thank you!